Digital currency solutions that directly face consumers will not be taken seriously by central banks, according to a Visa executive.
Consumer-facing digital currency solutions will not be taken seriously by central banks, according to a Visa executive.
Visa head of crypto Cuy Sheffield tweeted on May 18 that he does not believe central banks are interested in providing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) directly to consumers, stating:
“If a central bank decides to offer a digital wallet directly to consumers then by default CBDC and the central bank would have to become a household brand but this approach seems unlikely to be taken seriously by most major central banks due to operational challenges.”
Sheffield’s remarks follow a report released by enterprise blockchain firm R3, which stated that no central bank is currently working on a CBDC that can be used by consumers.
The two types of CBDC
Sheffield sees two approaches to CBDC implementation, the first being a consumer-facing solution resembling cash, while the second is a new real-time payment infrastructure for banks.
In the case of the digital cash solution, Sheffield doubted how central banks would explain the difference between CBDCs and digital deposits at commercial banks to consumers. He wrote:
“This would be particularly difficult to explain if CBDC is designed in a way that doesn’t allow a consumer to do anything different than they could with an app like Venmo connected to their existing digital deposits at their bank.”
Sheffield explained that, to make the difference apparent to consumers, CBDCs would need to have features that digital deposits do not, such as limited anonymity and offline payments. Otherwise, consumers will not understand the difference between old payment systems and CBDCs:
“The other option is just to say that consumers won’t need to know the difference between ‘digital cash’ and ‘digital deposits’ any more than they will understand the difference between FedNow and TCH payment rails.”
In the second approach, wherein a CBDC serves as a payments infrastructure, Scheffield states that the currency ecosystem would serve as a basis on which firms could build their wallets and services.
In such a case, consumers wouldn’t associate the functionalities with the central bank itself, but rather with the firms whose wallet and payment services they use:
“Consumers would have the relationship with the fintech wallet and adopt it based on the brand and features of the wallet rather than the features and liability structure of the underlying money that it’s built on.”
Visa is interested in digital currencies
Visa has not been shy of showing its interest in blockchain technology, cryptocurrencies and digital currencies. In one of the last examples, Visa recently filed a patent application for a digital currency recorded on a blockchain with the U.S. States Patent and Trademark Office.
Source: , CoinTelegraph
Articles listed with Cash Tech News as the author are either general information, or may have been imported from another website, to bring our readers a rich media experience that encompasses articles that we find interesting, as well as those curated by others.
The views and opinions expressed here are for informational purposes only, and should not be confused with professional financial advice. These opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of CashTechNews.com. Every investment and trade involves risk. You should conduct your own research, and contact your professional financial advisor before making any investment.
Corrections, feedback, and ideas should be submitted through the website contact form.