The U.S. Marshals Service is holding yet another Bitcoin auction on March 19, 2018, to the tune of 2,170 Bitcoins, valued at nearly $25 million USD, according to a press release on March 5. The funds are derived from asset seizures related to “various federal criminal, civil and administrative cases.” In order to participate, potential bidders are required to register for the auction by 12pm EST on March 14. A $200,000, refundable deposit is also required. Once registered, participants may submit bids by email, for any of 14 total blocks of 500, 100 and 70 Bitcoins.
In the official notice from the US Marshalls Service, the sources for this sealed bid auction are detailed as the following list of cases:
- United States v. Carl James Pugh, Northern District of Ohio (Case No. 16-00291)
- Consent to Abandon 4.63084383 Bitcoin by Justin Moreira (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives)
- Abandoned Bitcoin (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives)
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 9.97 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 10.47 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 30.10 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 12.273 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 3.331848 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 2.224717195 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 125.4948 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 15.20927131 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 0.7763 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 2.53607372 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 182.746277 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 5 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 50.0998 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 50 Bitcoin
- DEA Administrative Forfeiture of 4.653 Bitcoin
- United States v. Shaun Bridges (Case No. 17-0448)
- United States v. Bitcoin Account Wallet Address xxxxChgi, Containing 164.57107207 Bitcoin and Bitcoin Account Wallet Address xxx67Ly Containing 28.988387 Bitcoin (Case No. 14-645)
Of the 20 sources of Bitcoin, five appear related to actual cases that have gone through due process, and most of those appear to be related to drug offenses. The remaining 13 sources of Bitcoin are listed as “DEA Administrative Forfeiture” and appear to come from Civil Asset Forfeiture, for which there is no due process. According to Justice.gov, “Administrative Forfeiture” is defined as follows:
Administrative forfeiture is an in rem action that permits the federal seizing agency to forfeit the property without judicial involvement. The authority for a seizing agency to start an administrative forfeiture action is found in the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1607. Property that can be administratively forfeited is: merchandise the importation of which is prohibited; a conveyance used to import, transport, or store a controlled substance; a monetary instrument; or other property that does not exceed $500,000 in value.
Source: A Guide to Equitable Sharing of Federally Forfeited Property for State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, U.S. Department of Justice, March 1994.
In other words, the DEA seized people’s property, in the form of Bitcoin, without any sort of court order or due process. There was no conviction, there was no trial, and there was no judgment other than the discretion of DEA agents on the ground who felt that property should be seized by the state, and auctioned off, for the purposes of funding their department.
To be clear: the state can seize your property, even if you’re innocent. This is completely unconstitutional as framed in the Bill of Rights, and such an invasion of life, liberty and property was one of the main reasons behind the American Revolution. Yet, the Supreme Court has upheld asset forfeiture despite these facts. This is akin to thought crime, the idea that you can be punished because the state thinks you have committed a crime, or that you will commit a crime. No trial is needed, only the opinion of a member of the DEA or other organization that stands to profit from taking your property.
In Communist China, the dictatorial police state is already implementing “predictive policing programs.” Using big data collected from social media and other sources, facial recognition and other technology, the Chinese government is arbitrarily detaining people in “political education centers” and holding them indefinitely, without charge or trial. This is arguably the next step in a police state’s rule over its people. First they take your property without trial, and then they take you. Let us not forget the “internment” (imprisonment) of Americans of Japanese ancestry during FDR’s presidency. To say that the US would never cross such a line is naïve at best, with companies like Palantir working in secret with the government to use facial recognition and other spy software for a US form of predictive policing – today.
Such infringements on individual liberties are the foundation for decentralized value systems like Bitcoin. There is no denying that partaking in this Bitcoin auction can be profitable, and the reality is that somebody will buy the coins. But it is important to understand the precident that this sets, and how it impacts our rights as outlined in the US constitution.
Daniel is an experienced and dynamic entrepreneur with a demonstrated history of launching and operating successful businesses. Skilled in Business Strategy, Technical Consulting, Coaching, Sales, Entrepreneurship, Team Building, and Public Speaking.
The views and opinions expressed here are for informational purposes only, and should not be confused with professional financial advice. These opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of CashTechNews.com. Every investment and trade involves risk. You should conduct your own research, and contact your professional financial advisor before making any investment.
Corrections, feedback, and ideas should be submitted through the website contact form.